- Dec 2, 2024
- Feb 18, 2024
A dramatic moment unfolded during a recent cricket match when a ball struck the stumps, yet the batsman was incredibly ruled not out. The incident, shared by the South Yarra Cricket Club, highlighted the intricacies of the game’s regulations and how fortune can sometimes favour the courageous.
While the impact disturbed the stump, the bails remained miraculously perched on top, defying gravity. Thankfully for the batter, Law 29 of the Laws of Cricket stipulates that the wicket is only considered broken if either one bail is completely removed or a stump is uprooted. Since neither of these conditions were met in this instance, the umpire was obliged to declare the batsman not out.
This incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between skill and chance in cricket. While a well-executed shot can result in a glorious dismissal, sometimes, even the most accurate delivery can be thwarted by a quirk of fate. For the batter in question, this unexpected stroke of luck undoubtedly provided a much-needed moment of relief amidst the competitive pressure of the match.
In cricket, a batsman is not out even if the ball hits the stumps if the bails do not fall or the stump does not come out. Law 29.2 states that the wicket is broken fairly in the following condition:: a bail is completely removed from the top of the stumps, or a stump is struck out of the ground, by the ball.
This means that for the batsman to be out, one of the following needs to happen:
It is important to note that the following situations do not constitute the wicket being broken:
In all these situations, the batsman will be given not out.
https://twitter.com/robinjescott/status/1733805025866944675
It’s not out, correct decision. Bails aren’t off and not stump out of the ground.
— Bladey McBladeface (@Bladey1889) December 10, 2023
That's the fault of the umpires for not ensuring the stumps and nails arent so tightly packed that this can happen…
— Cheese of the Beijing Ducks (@Simonashmore5) December 10, 2023
Think I would have walked for that one. But not against Illminster obviously.
— Dave Richardson🟦 (@frocesterrico) December 10, 2023
I am stupid. Is this for real ?
— Naman Jani (@NaJaniKoi) December 10, 2023
my only question is: how the bails didn't fall ? stuck together ?
— Charlie Joe (@CharlieJoe4) December 10, 2023
@kblockpoole your type of luck
— G R A H A M (@___GJS___) December 10, 2023