Cricket News

3 reasons why India Tests could spell the end of Bazball

Excitement for the India-England Test series is reaching fever pitch! With just two days until the first ball is bowled in Hyderabad, cricket fans across the globe are buzzing with anticipation. The […]

Excitement for the India-England Test series is reaching fever pitch! With just two days until the first ball is bowled in Hyderabad, cricket fans across the globe are buzzing with anticipation. The unusual hype over a Test series in India is because England have been playing an attacking brand of test cricket in recent times, which has been labelled as Bazball by the media. Everyone is eager to see if this approach will work in conditions in which India have a huge advantage.

A huge section believes that England’s attacking methods will not work in India. Whispers of its demise echo in punditry circles and fan forums. Here’s a look at three reasons why the series could put Bazball to rest:

#1 India’s terrific trio

India’s spin attack, spearheaded by the formidable trio of Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, and Axar Patel, is a force to be reckoned with, especially in the turning pitches of their home soil. With the upcoming Test series against England promising conditions that favour spin from the get-go, these wily bowlers are primed to weave a web of deceit for the English batsmen.

Ashwin’s clever off-spin, Jadeja’s left-arm guile and Axar Patel’s variations will be a tough nut to crack. Each bowler brings a unique weapon to the arsenal, making them a truly menacing proposition. But it’s not just about individual brilliance. This Indian spin attack hunts as a pack. They communicate, strategize, and anticipate the batsman’s moves, creating a suffocating atmosphere where escape seems impossible. England’s batsmen, known for their attacking intent, are bound to face a stern test.

Of course, the English might not go down without a fight and will have their plans to counter the lethal trio. But underestimating the experience of Ashwin, Jadeja, and Patel would be a grave mistake. These bowlers have seen it all and will be well prepared for the challenge that is Bazball.

#2 Formidable pace-attack

While the shadow of India’s spin trio looms large over Bazball’s ambitions, another danger lurks just beyond the turning pitches. India’s pace attack, a potent quartet of swing, seam, and raw speed, possesses the firepower to puncture England’s attacking bubble.

Forcing England to confront spin from Day 1 might tempt them to unleash their aggressive instincts against the pacers. This, however, could be a fatal miscalculation. Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj and Mukesh Kumar are high-quality pacers and if fit later, Mohammed Shami’s presence will only make the attack stronger. These bowlers are more than just wicket-takers; they are masters of control and pressure. They understand the subtle nuance of Indian pitches, knowing exactly when to exploit a hint of movement or a batsman’s impatience. Facing them after battling relentless spin could be like stepping from one fiery pit into another.

Bazball thrives on momentum and freedom and hence, India’s pacers could exploit that by disrupting the rhythm. Each dot ball, each awkward edge, will chip away at the confidence and patience so crucial to Bazball’s success.

#3 England’s lack of high-quality spinners

England’s audacious Bazball approach may face its sternest test yet in India, not just against the wily spinners, but also due to the fragility of their spin-bowling options. While India boasts a fearsome trio, England’s spin cupboard holds a much less potent brew.

Jack Leach, the most experienced of the lot, is a capable left-armer, but his record against top-quality opposition leaves questions unanswered. Rehan Ahmed, a talented youngster, is exciting but raw, his Test appearances mere flickers in his nascent career. Shoaib Bashir, a surprise selection, and Tom Hartley, with a handful of First-Class games, add depth but hardly inspire awe. The disparity is stark. While India can rotate their spinners based on pitch conditions and batsman weaknesses, England lacks the luxury of choice.

Related Posts